... | @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ |
... | @@ -2,11 +2,11 @@ |
|
|
|
|
|
### What is the F-value?
|
|
### What is the F-value?
|
|
|
|
|
|
The **F-value** is a test statistic used in ANOVA and regression models to assess whether the model is statistically significant. It compares the variance explained by the model (signal) to the unexplained variance (noise). A high F-value indicates that the model explains a significant amount of the variance, while a low F-value suggests that the model doesn't improve much over using the mean of the outcome.
|
|
The **F-value** is a test statistic used in both ANOVA and regression models to assess whether the model is statistically significant. It compares the variance explained by the model (signal) to the unexplained variance (noise). A high F-value indicates that the model explains a significant amount of the variance, while a low F-value suggests that the model doesn't improve much over using the mean of the outcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### How to Calculate the F-value
|
|
### F-value in Regression Models
|
|
|
|
|
|
To calculate the F-value, you need to partition the total variance in the outcome variable into explained and unexplained components. This begins with calculating the **Total Sum of Squares (SST)**, which measures how far the observed data points deviate from the overall mean:
|
|
In regression models, the F-value tests whether the overall regression model explains significantly more variance than expected by chance. To calculate the F-value, you need to partition the total variance in the outcome variable into explained and unexplained components. This starts with calculating the **Total Sum of Squares (SST)**, which measures how far the observed data points deviate from the overall mean:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
$$
|
|
SST = \sum (y_i - \bar{y})^2
|
|
SST = \sum (y_i - \bar{y})^2
|
... | @@ -37,47 +37,83 @@ Where: |
... | @@ -37,47 +37,83 @@ Where: |
|
- $y_i$: The observed value for each data point
|
|
- $y_i$: The observed value for each data point
|
|
- $\hat{y}_i$: The predicted value from the model
|
|
- $\hat{y}_i$: The predicted value from the model
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, the total explained and unexplained variance must be adjusted for the number of predictors and observations. The **Mean Square Between (MSB)** is calculated by dividing the **SSR** by the number of predictors, $p$:
|
|
The total variance (SST) is partitioned into explained (SSR) and unexplained (SSE) variance, and we compute the **Mean Square Between (MSB)** and **Mean Square Within (MSW)** by adjusting for the number of predictors and observations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **MSB (Explained Variance)** is calculated as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
$$
|
|
MSB = \frac{SSR}{p}
|
|
MSB = \frac{SSR}{p}
|
|
$$
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
And the **Mean Square Within (MSW)**, representing unexplained variance, is calculated by dividing the **SSE** by the degrees of freedom. In most regression models, the degrees of freedom is $n - p - 1$, where:
|
|
- **MSW (Unexplained Variance)** is calculated as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
MSW = \frac{SSE}{n - p - 1}
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
- $n$ is the number of observations,
|
|
- $n$ is the number of observations,
|
|
- $p$ is the number of predictors,
|
|
- $p$ is the number of predictors,
|
|
- The **-1** accounts for the intercept, which is also estimated as a parameter.
|
|
- The **-1** accounts for the intercept.
|
|
|
|
|
|
For models **without an intercept**, you don’t subtract the 1, so the degrees of freedom becomes $n - p$. This is because the intercept isn't estimated, so the number of independent data points isn't reduced.
|
|
For models **without an intercept**, the degrees of freedom is simply $n - p$.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The **F-value** is then calculated by dividing the explained variance by the unexplained variance:
|
|
Finally, the **F-value** is calculated as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
$$
|
|
F = \frac{MSB}{MSW}
|
|
F = \frac{MSB}{MSW}
|
|
$$
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
This ratio shows how much more variance is explained by the model compared to the variance left unexplained. A large F-value means the model explains much more variance than random chance, indicating significance. Conversely, a small F-value means the model doesn't improve much over using the mean.
|
|
This ratio tells us how much more variance the model explains compared to the residual variance. A high F-value indicates that the model explains significantly more variance than expected by chance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Interpretation
|
|
### F-value in ANOVA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In **ANOVA**, the F-value is calculated using similar principles but applied to comparing group means rather than predictors. ANOVA compares the variance **between groups** (explained variance) with the variance **within groups** (unexplained variance). The **between-groups sum of squares (SSB)** is analogous to SSR in regression and measures the variance due to differences between the group means:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
SSB = \sum n_g (\bar{y}_g - \bar{y})^2
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
- $n_g$: Number of observations in group $g$
|
|
|
|
- $\bar{y}_g$: Mean of group $g$
|
|
|
|
- $\bar{y}$: Overall mean of all groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
The F-value tests whether the model provides a better fit than using just the mean. A high F-value indicates that the data points are closer to the regression line, showing that the model fits well. A low F-value suggests that the data points are scattered, indicating a poor fit.
|
|
The **within-groups sum of squares (SSW)** is analogous to SSE and measures the variance within each group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
In **simple regression** (one predictor), the F-value is equivalent to the t-test, with the F-value being the square of the t-value ($F = t^2$). In **multiple regression**, the F-value tests the overall model significance, while t-tests assess the individual predictors.
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
SSW = \sum \sum (y_{gi} - \bar{y}_g)^2
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
- $y_{gi}$: Observed value in group $g$
|
|
|
|
- $\bar{y}_g$: Mean of group $g$
|
|
|
|
|
|
In **ANOVA**, the degrees of freedom are calculated similarly, where $n$ is the number of observations and $g$ is the number of groups:
|
|
The **degrees of freedom** in ANOVA are:
|
|
- **Between-groups degrees of freedom**: $g - 1$ (analogous to the number of predictors minus one),
|
|
- **Between-groups degrees of freedom**: $g - 1$, where $g$ is the number of groups.
|
|
- **Within-groups degrees of freedom**: $n - g$ (similar to residuals in regression).
|
|
- **Within-groups degrees of freedom**: $n - g$, where $n$ is the total number of observations and $g$ is the number of groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here, the $-1$ is because the overall mean is estimated, just like the intercept in regression.
|
|
The **F-value** in ANOVA is calculated as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
F = \frac{MSB}{MSW}
|
|
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Where:
|
|
|
|
- **MSB (Between-groups Mean Square)**: $\frac{SSB}{g - 1}$
|
|
|
|
- **MSW (Within-groups Mean Square)**: $\frac{SSW}{n - g}$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In ANOVA, a large F-value indicates that the group means are significantly different from each other, while a small F-value suggests that any differences between the groups are due to random variation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Interpretation
|
|
|
|
|
|
### When to Use the F-value
|
|
The F-value tests whether the model provides a better fit than using just the mean. A high F-value indicates that the data points are close to the regression line (in regression) or that group means differ significantly (in ANOVA), showing that the model fits well. A low F-value suggests that the model does not provide a meaningful improvement over using the mean alone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Multiple Regression**: To test if a group of predictors collectively explain significant variance in the outcome.
|
|
In **simple regression** (one predictor), the F-value is equivalent to the t-test, with the F-value being the square of the t-value ($F = t^2$). In **multiple regression**, the F-value tests the overall model significance, while t-tests assess the significance of individual predictors.
|
|
- **ANOVA**: To test if the means of different groups are statistically different.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Example (Good Practice)
|
|
### Example (Good Practice)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Suppose you are modeling plant growth based on factors like sunlight, water, and fertilizer. The F-value will tell you whether these predictors, collectively, significantly explain the variation in plant growth. A large F-value suggests that the model is a good fit.
|
|
Suppose you are modeling plant growth based on factors like sunlight, water, and fertilizer. In regression, the F-value tests whether these predictors, collectively, significantly explain the variation in plant growth. In ANOVA, the F-value tests whether different treatment groups (e.g., different levels of sunlight) have significantly different effects on plant growth. A high F-value in both cases suggests a good model fit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Example (Bad Practice)
|
|
### Example (Bad Practice)
|
|
|
|
|
... | | ... | |