... | @@ -136,6 +136,4 @@ $$ |
... | @@ -136,6 +136,4 @@ $$ |
|
R^2_{\text{Nagelkerke}} = \frac{R^2_{\text{Cox-Snell}}}{1 - \left( L_{\text{null\ model}} \right)^{2/n}}
|
|
R^2_{\text{Nagelkerke}} = \frac{R^2_{\text{Cox-Snell}}}{1 - \left( L_{\text{null\ model}} \right)^{2/n}}
|
|
$$
|
|
$$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each pseudo-R² provides an indication of the model fit, with values closer to 1 indicating a better fit. However, unlike traditional R², pseudo-R² values can vary depending on the model and should be interpreted with caution.
|
|
Each pseudo-R² provides an indication of the model fit, with values closer to 1 indicating a better fit. However, unlike traditional R², pseudo-R² values can vary depending on the model and should be interpreted with caution. |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
By carefully interpreting R², adjusted R², and pseudo-R² values, you can assess how well your models explain the variability in your data while avoiding overfitting and other common pitfalls. |
|
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |
|
|